The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I think we can just acknowledge that vitamin C is an antioxidant and that it's it's probably the case that that the bulk of what you do with vitamin C when you have excess above what's needed to prevent scurvy is probably much more related to that antioxidant function than it is to supporting enzymes of collagen synthesis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.