The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
while another clinical trial [2] with over 25,000 participants showed that vitamin D supplementation reduced the incidence of metastatic and fatal cancers by just below 20%, intriguingly no protective effect in overweight people, and no reduction in overall cancer incidence.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
found those that had been taking vitamin D for at least 2 years had a 25% reduction in cancer deaths.