The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because of variation in genetic background there will even be some of you out there who are super anti-s sunscreen who are peeling your shirts off all the time who getting lots of sun exposure who may surprisingly have vitamin D levels that are still low that's rare okay for all the obvious reasons but it could still be the case and indeed some of the dermatologists that I spoke to said they occasionally have a patient like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.