Andrew Huberman· PhD
just because people with low levels of vitamin D tend to get colds and flu more often than people that don't does not necessarily mean that vitamin D deficiencies are the reason for that
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just because people with low levels of vitamin D tend to get colds and flu more often than people that don't does not necessarily mean that vitamin D deficiencies are the reason for that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
just because people with low levels of vitamin D tend to get colds and flu more often than people that don't does not necessarily mean that vitamin D deficiencies are the reason for that for instance we know that people that get regular sunlight exposure