Andrew Huberman· PhD
And so, um, it really does hammer home the importance of measuring your vitamin D levels and, uh, being being, uh, very proactive about that.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And so, um, it really does hammer home the importance of measuring your vitamin D levels and, uh, being being, uh, very proactive about that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, the Medallia randomization studies, in addition to the randomized controlled trials, I think another piece of evidence that hints towards possible causation of vitamin D being important for preventing respiratory tract mortality as well.
So another way of measuring more of a causative role, you know, of certain factors, and particularly, in this case, lifestyle factors or something that, you know, I call vitamin D lifestyle, because you're making it you know, from the sun, they're called Mendelian randomization studies.