Rhonda Patrick· PhD
Neuroimaging studies correlate higher serum vitamin D with fewer white matter hyperintensities—markers of structural brain damage predictive of dementia.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Neuroimaging studies correlate higher serum vitamin D with fewer white matter hyperintensities—markers of structural brain damage predictive of dementia.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Neuroimaging studies correlate higher serum vitamin D with fewer white matter hyperintensities—markers of structural brain damage predictive of dementia.
For every 10 nanomal per liter increase in vitamin D, there was a small decrease in
But then you can go a step further and you can look at other studies that have shown vitamin D deficiency actually accelerates brain aging. So there have been studies that have shown that have looked by fMRI at what's called white matter hyperintensities. So these kind of show up of as little white hypers spots if you're looking at a MRI image of the brain and it's really a marker of damage to the white matter in the brain.
for every 10 nanimals per liter increase in vitamin D levels there was a decrease in the damage to their to the white matter part of the brain
vitamin D deficiency causes this what's called white matter hyperintensities. It's this type of damage and white matter that shows up as like a white spot on an fMRI