Paul Saladino· MD
so all the points say 45 is a nominal ancestral D and what do we see down to 30 you're still doing fantastic but under 30 and under 20 you're in the toilet
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so all the points say 45 is a nominal ancestral D and what do we see down to 30 you're still doing fantastic but under 30 and under 20 you're in the toilet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.