The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the treatment group had serum levels of vitamin D of 39 nanograms per milliliter compared to the placebo group which had levels of 30 nanograms per milliliter not a big difference in fact both 30 and 39 nanograms per milliliter are considered adequate levels of vitamin D therefore it's difficult to make any conclusions about the effects of vitamin D on cognitive function between these two groups
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.