The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
vitamin D is a complicated one all right uh let and we can talk about vitamin D and how either important or non-important it is because there's a there's a quirk to vitamin D and uh uh it it's important for your audience to know about it because everybody in his brothers you know touting vitamin D a cure for everything
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The problem is these clinical trials, these pesky little things, keep showing up demonstrating that supplemental vitamin D doesn't really seem to help that much.