Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I think that the USDA database that most of this is based on is incorrect and has never really done a good assay of vitamin E in animal fat because when I have had my vitamin E tested on a purely carnivorous diet my vitamin E was above the reference range so I think that when you are looking at some of these tools like chronometer vitamin E is a little bit funky
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.