Rhonda Patrick· PhD
however in the control mice that did not have cancer the same doses of supplemental vitamin E did not cause cancer in fact it did just the opposite it prevented DNA damage a well-known cancer initiator
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
however in the control mice that did not have cancer the same doses of supplemental vitamin E did not cause cancer in fact it did just the opposite it prevented DNA damage a well-known cancer initiator
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.