The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we are never Limited at the level of the mitochondria I would say statistically speaking so if you're not talking about people I me not talking about people with mitochondrial disease but if you're if you're if you're talking about you and me and your athletes and most of the people listening to this when we ask the question where is the the rate limiting step in oxygen consumption or more to the point oxygen utilization it is not at the mitochondria
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's at the level of stroke volume that it's actually at getting the plasma to the muscle is that what you believe yeah getting getting getting the blood getting the oxygen getting the hemoglobin transported to the cells is the most most important thing more l so so it's basically is a is more of a central limitation than a peripherial limitation
because the per the peripher is where if you look at it for example from mitochondrial perspective it is so the ratio between what it can use is so extreme compared to what we are able to pump around or or take up in our lungs and pump around to to the body compared to what we can what we can use