The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you could reverse engineer where you want your vo2 max to be when you're 90 what should it be because if you have a sense of what your vo2 max should be when you're 90 you kind of know what it needs to be when you're 80 70 60 blah blah blah blah all the way back
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
most people at least based on what they're telling you they want to be able to do in the last decade of their life are going to require a V2 Max of about 30 so high 20s to 30 um in the final decade of their life and I mean Nick when you look at that what's your what's your takeaway if if I'm telling you you need a V2 Max of of 30 if you're 90 yeah you better be in the 95th percentile you you have to be higher right because the the people on this graph who have a V2 Max of 30 um at the at at age 75 are going to be lower than that at the age of 90 so yet you have to be way above the top of the green curve at the outset
if I'm telling you you need a V2 Max of of 30 if you're 90 yeah you better be in the 95th percentile and you you have to be higher right because the the people on this graph who have a V2 Max of 30 um at the at at age 7 5 are going to be lower than that at the age of 90 so yet you have to be way above the top of the green curve at the outset
most people at least based on what they're telling you they want to be able to do in the last decade of their life are going to require a V2 Max of about 30