Rhonda Patrick· PhD
And that's because when we do an all-out 30-second effort, a large majority, not all of it, but a large majority of the energy is derived from anaerobic or non-oxidative metabolism.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And that's because when we do an all-out 30-second effort, a large majority, not all of it, but a large majority of the energy is derived from anaerobic or non-oxidative metabolism.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And so when we talk about anaerobic capacity, the best measure, or the most commonly accepted measure of anaerobic capacity is a Wingate test.