The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and therefore it might be a good tool for estimating V2 Max but it's not a great tool for measuring total energy expenditure which is calculated by using V2 and vco2 and nor is it a great tool for measuring uh fat oxidation because there you must be able to look at a very accurate ratio of vco2 and V2
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.