The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you could have easily done that, felt great, been more energetic, been able to run more and get a better V2 max. Even that is like subject measurement. I don't even want to go into the territory. A lot of people just do it and they say I feel great and etc. But then if you're constantly measuring one intervention across hundreds of markers, you catch anywhere where it lets you down.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.