The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there are thresholds of vo2 max below which they hypothesize that you can't i can't remember if it's like 18 or not or maybe it's nine or something like that where it's like at this point you're you've crossed the sort of mortality and it's where we think you're going to die in a few years because you can't do activities of daily living
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when i'm 90 the real risk is that i won't be able to get up out of a chair more than that i won't have the the vo2 max
if you're trying to reverse engineer ending your life with a V2 Max in the mid 20s to high 30s the good news is you are never going to not be able to do something that you want to do correct
this figure says if you want to live a good life you better have a high VO2 max because this gives you a very clear all-in-one view of what actually happens as your V2 Max declines you lose capacity
once the V2 Max is Into The High Teens we would say that you are now going to be limited in what you can do from an activity of daily living standpoint