The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
zinc is interesting because you don't want to supplement zinc without copper there is a zinc copper ratio that is well-maintained in the body supplementation with one or the other will typically deplete the other and you know as a geriatrician there's a a zinc copper ratio things that we think of as kind of proxies for overall brain health not saying that the zinc copper ratio is the only thing but certainly supplementing with one or the other one would be careful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.