The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And 300 watts to a professional cyclist who only weighs 60 to 65 kilos is just below five watts per kilogram. Whereas the person with diabetes... almost assuredly weighs more. So their 120 watts is probably 1.5 watts per kilo.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But most interesting was the people with type 2 diabetes. I think we're like 120 watts. Is that about right?