Peter Attia· MD
So again you can pack in volume of training um in a way that you can't with very high intensity.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So again you can pack in volume of training um in a way that you can't with very high intensity.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And again, volume drives adaptation. That's the thing to remember. It's volume above all else that's driving adaptation, provided that volume is at least at zone two where you start to um, undergo all those changes we discussed.
However, as you progressively increase your training volume, a more varied intensity distribution—including more zone 2 work—becomes beneficial.