How We Lost Control of Our Food w/ Kyle Diamantas

PS

Paul Saladino16m · 2025-06-06

Claims Made

45

Claims Supported

23

Support Rate

51%

Support rate

23 of 45 claims supported

23 supported22 partial / not

Claims from this content

21

Well SupportedFood has been engineered to be highly addictive, leading to increased consumption and calorie intake.Partially SupportedThe GRAS loophole created in the 1950s was not designed for the proliferation of over 10,000 food additives.Partially SupportedThe FDA was unable to implement a mandatory GRAS review system, leading to companies self-certifying ingredients as GRAS without FDA oversight or public data disclosure.Partially SupportedSixty to seventy percent of current food products are ultra-processed, characterized by a proliferation of ingredients not historically present in food.Partially Supported

Discussion

Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this content — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.

M

Share your read of this content…

Posting publicly as you · linked to your social profiles

Sort by:

AV

A. Volkovreader

4h

Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.

NP

N. Park

2d

Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.

The increasing use of ingredients like natural flavors, food dyes, emulsifiers, and stabilizers contributes to a proliferation of potentially problematic ingredients and ultra-processed foods.

Partially SupportedFood ingredients were created for idealistic purposes such as increasing the food supply, reducing costs, and improving shelf stability, but their long-term health effects were not adequately studied.

Partially SupportedThe food industry's push for shelf-stable products led to the widespread use of new ingredients.

Partially SupportedFood dyes are petroleum-based chemicals with potential impacts being researched and considered for legislation.

Partially SupportedThe 1958 Food Additives Amendments created an exception for ingredients generally recognized as safe (GRAS), allowing them into food without FDA approval.

Partially SupportedUnlike drugs, food ingredients have historically lacked a robust framework for continuous safety review after approval.

Partially SupportedAdditives used for shelf life, quality preservation, or anti-clumping may have negative long-term health effects.

Partially SupportedThe FDA is establishing a formal review process for food additives, moving from reactive to proactive.

Partially SupportedSome ingredients that have entered the food supply through GRAS standards may be harmful.

Partially SupportedFood dyes may contribute to the chronic disease epidemic.

Partially SupportedSmall steps and incremental changes in the right direction can lead to significant long-term impact.

Partially SupportedThe combination of factors in modern food processing is detrimental to human health.

Partially SupportedThe FDA, in partnership with NIH, is investing in research to study ultra-processed foods and their potential risks, including added sugars, stabilizers, and preservatives.

Partially SupportedRising rates of obesity and chronic diseases across all age groups may be linked to addictive and engineered food properties beyond just calorie intake.

Partially SupportedThe attractiveness of food due to dyes can lead to overconsumption, contributing to obesity and diabetes risks.

Not SupportedFood dyes have no nutritional or functional benefit, do not preserve food, and are not used in Europe.

Partially SupportedThe chronic disease problem is associated with multiple factors including ultra-processing, stripping of wheat, and the addition of ingredients.