Our read is that the carnivore or animal-based diet may offer significant health benefits for some individuals, but it also presents notable risks and uncertainties that warrant careful consideration.
The carnivore diet, often defined as an animal-based diet, has been associated with improvements in mental clarity, weight loss, and remission of autoimmune diseases, with its utility being reverse-engineered from anecdotal evidence, according to Peter Attia and Paul Saladino.
However, experts like Paul Saladino also report experiencing problems after prolonged strict adherence, including electrolyte imbalances, declining testosterone, and heart palpitations, suggesting potential downsides to long-term, strict carnivory.
While some benefits are attributed to the immune system's response to plant compounds or addressing insulin resistance, the diet's long-term safety and impact on various health markers, such as LDL cholesterol and gut microbiome diversity, remain subjects of ongoing discussion and uncertainty among experts.
A carnivore diet typically involves nose-to-tail eating of animal foods and adequate salt, with some variations including less toxic plant foods, fruit, goat's milk kefir, and raw honey. A 30-day animal-based reset, 'Nose to Tail January,' has been suggested. Some individuals have followed a diet of 95-99% meat with minimal or no plants for two weeks. For active individuals, up to 200 grams of carbohydrates daily may be needed to prevent muscle twitches.
Paul Saladino reported that sustained absence of insulin on a carnivore diet could lead to muscle loss and decreased bone density. He also experienced hair loss and scalp pain after three months on a carnivore diet, suggesting a folate deficiency and the need for organs and fat. Paul Saladino, Peter Attia, and Rhonda Patrick noted a potential downside of the carnivore diet is a significant increase in LDL cholesterol and LDL particle count in some individuals. Paul Saladino experienced electrolyte problems, heart palpitations, sleep disturbances, and declining testosterone after two years on a strict carnivore diet, and a decrease in active thyroid hormone (total T3) and slightly decreased testosterone after about a year and a half. He also noted that long-term ketosis from a strict carnivore diet can lead to electrolyte imbalances and energy crashes, suggesting a need to include some carbohydrates. Paul Saladino stated that problems experienced on a pure carnivore diet were not solely due to overconsumption of organs. He also mentioned that individuals with chronic kidney disease should exercise caution with a carnivore diet, paying attention to protein macros and monitoring kidney function. Paul Saladino observed that patients on higher-protein carnivore diets may exhibit elevated BUN, creatinine, uric acid, and glucose, while vitamin D, folate, and sometimes iron can be decreased. He also noted that some individuals report increased food sensitivity after adopting a carnivore diet, which may be due to becoming more aware of pre-existing sensitivities. Paul Saladino stated that it is uncertain if carnivore and ketogenic diets promote healing or simply prevent further harm, and it is unknown how long one can adhere to a carnivore diet before it becomes difficult to reintroduce plant-based foods.
The verdict could change with more definitive research on the long-term effects of the carnivore diet on various health markers, including cardiovascular health, bone density, and hormonal balance. Clearer guidelines on nutrient supplementation, particularly for folate and electrolytes, and a better understanding of individual variability in response to the diet would also be impactful. Additionally, studies that definitively establish the necessity or non-necessity of plant foods for a healthy microbiome would be crucial.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Most of the support comes from short or small studies.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.