Bryan Johnson· Author
+ 49 out of ~70 ingredients (70%) have an unknown dose - that’s insane
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
+ 49 out of ~70 ingredients (70%) have an unknown dose - that’s insane
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
+ Pixie-dusting: providing a fraction of clinically effective doses
So, let's see who doesn't have clinically relevant doses or disclose what's in the product. AG1 comes to mind.
Pixie dusting that means they list an ingredient that you may be familiar with and you think it's good for you but instead of giving you the amount that was shown to work in the clinical trial they give you a much lower amount
Also, the probiotic dose is quite minuscule