Andrew Huberman· PhD
the really solid data point to no health benefit from it (contrary to what we were told for many years) and that it’s probably worse for a lot of people than they knew, elevated cancer risk, etc.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the really solid data point to no health benefit from it (contrary to what we were told for many years) and that it’s probably worse for a lot of people than they knew, elevated cancer risk, etc.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And that's that two drinks per week limit that really sets the upper limit and threshold beyond which you start running into issues with cellular mutation. You start running into issues of oxidative stress, greatly increase cancer risk, in particular breast cancer risk.
even one drink per day can be considered moderate alcohol consumption this could be extremely risky for both men and women because of the dramatic increases in two very common cancers breast and colon cancer