Andrew Huberman· PhD
so the two Hallmarks of Alzheimer's — uh histopathologically would be plaques and Tangles — and even that now is of course coming under under question
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the two Hallmarks of Alzheimer's — uh histopathologically would be plaques and Tangles — and even that now is of course coming under under question
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's been some debate in recent years as to whether or not the whole amalo hypothesis is real or not there's a bunch of unfortunately false data accusations and that whole thing but my understanding is that if you look at us slice of human brain from an alz a patient that died with Alzheimer's maybe even from Alzheimer that you see plaques and Tangles you see these — subcellar structures and buildup and that our basic understanding of Alzheimer's that's in the textbook and that most people have heard of — is still correct