The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people who have the highest rates of mental health problems in terms of like have they faced challenges people who've had a ton of tragedies and challenges thrown at them in life they don't have great mental health i mean this is just like constant stuff going wrong right but you look at the other end of the spectrum and the people who have had no real challenges not too much ever go wrong for them they have equally bad mental health there's a sweet spot it's a u-shaped curve
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.