The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
like every test has a guideline as well and like unless you if you don't follow the guideline you can't actually make the assumption that your organ is a certain age because it has to be you know if you're using different equipment or different methodologies then it's going to be totally inaccurate so you have to use the exact right things to make sure you know to enable you to measure the age of an organ
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.