Paul Saladino· MD
but if somebody's like mildly elevated or maybe up to a two times limit uh two times higher than normal in the upper limit of the normal then it probably works a repeated test
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but if somebody's like mildly elevated or maybe up to a two times limit uh two times higher than normal in the upper limit of the normal then it probably works a repeated test
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're getting somebody who is like high four times up higher than the normal limit that person has problems there's no there's just no way physiologically they're going to be like in a normal state