The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the uh another one that so the CRP the ESR um lucky the hydrogenase is actually a pretty good one um it's kind of like a Sinister biomarker too uh because it's an inter it's an intracellular enzyme it's not supposed to be in the blood you know uh at a Beyond a certain level but it but basically it's elevating heart attacks uh various like inflammatory conditions and infections like a meningitis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.