The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But you also want to look at other markers that measure a similar thing like for example TNF alpha or um IL6. There's all these other markers that can also measure inflammation. And so it's important to make sure that we're measuring from multiple different areas and not just putting all of our faith in one particular marker.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean hscrp you know fibrinogen any other inflammatory markers that people could check very good one and probably my favorite ery precise sedimentation rate the SR okay yeah yeah it used to be uh the the one that the doctors would almost check in the early 20th century then for some reason it became a biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis I don't know why they only do it for rheumatoid arthritis because it's a non-specific it says in the medical books non-specific inflammatory biomarker right I think we can check some of the uh depending on how much the insurance is going to cover or with the lab will charge you can check some of the uh interlooking one and six are particularly bad you can check those right um some of the very successful anti-reheval toilet thread drugs are interlooking one and and or six antagonists right dnf Alpha uh that can be checked on a blood test as well