Rhonda Patrick· PhD
I always have kind of high levels of APO B but my um apoa is just completely off the charts so it's highly protective and and my ratio is great and as long as my inflammation's down I I could care less
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I always have kind of high levels of APO B but my um apoa is just completely off the charts so it's highly protective and and my ratio is great and as long as my inflammation's down I I could care less
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for me it really got down to I was measuring my ratio of uh AO a and uh APO B right and then if that was a good ratio then uh because those are my the best fraction of the HDL and the best and the worst fraction of the lbll right for me then if I measure that ratio but then said okay if that's in a pretty good ratio and my inflammation is always in pretty good order like homosysteine and CRP then I'm doing pretty well and I'm not going to even pay attention so I don't even care about LDL anymore