The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This is a real, quantifiable biological effect from the health tax created by social media. I saw the 10% tax in my biomarkers from a 40 hr fast (consistent with broader evidence). Evidence suggests a 25% tax would reveal itself with a 30 day social media fast.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The 40 hour social media fast dropped it by around 10%. Seems social media could be a 10% tax on my nervous system.