Andrew Huberman· PhD
I don't think it makes sense to just do blood tests for the sake of doing blood tests. There has to be kind of a reason. Is something changing?
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I don't think it makes sense to just do blood tests for the sake of doing blood tests. There has to be kind of a reason. Is something changing?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you don't get a test unless it's going to change management