Bryan Johnson· Author
Depending on how much your changing and your health status, blood every 3 months is best, 6 months is great, annually is solid.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Depending on how much your changing and your health status, blood every 3 months is best, 6 months is great, annually is solid.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one blood test every three months is inadequate
I would like you to at least get one every quarter because I think it's also important to you to see the data reflect it back to you on the progress you're making but regardless if you're in a challenged state if you're in a situation you and your doctor need to be more aware of what's happening in an ongoing basis and at a higher frequency