Paul Saladino· MD
the studies in animal models rats and mice that do show that components of red meat or red meat are associated with increased rates of colon cancer are consistently done in calcium deficient models
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the studies in animal models rats and mice that do show that components of red meat or red meat are associated with increased rates of colon cancer are consistently done in calcium deficient models
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I've talked about the importance of dairy many times and the importance of calcium in the human diet so make sure you're getting calcium from raw dairy from microcrystinal hydroxyapatite bone meal things like that Etc
animal studies utilize models that tested promotion of pre-cancerous pre-neoplastic conditions utilizing diets low in calcium this is a common trick or a common problem with animal research on heme heme iron or any of these compounds from meat in animal models and cancer and when they give the animals enough calcium they don't get cancer from heme or heme iron
I've talked about the importance of dairy many times and the importance of calcium in the human diet so make sure you're getting calcium from raw dairy from microcrystinal hydroxyapatite bone meal things like that Etc