Paul Saladino· MD
this meant that the health user bias of the margarine group was also at play the people who ate more margarine were the people listening to mainstream Health advice in the early 60s and 70s and they were smoking last drinking less
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this meant that the health user bias of the margarine group was also at play the people who ate more margarine were the people listening to mainstream Health advice in the early 60s and 70s and they were smoking last drinking less
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.