The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's an interesting amount of research that suggests that that protein is associated with higher incidence of bad stuff maybe it's more immunogenic i don't think like i said that it's an open-and-shut case but there's at least epidemiologic suggestion that it's associated with more type one diabetes maybe a little more atherosclerosis it's maybe a little more hypertension it's a strange thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.