Paul Saladino· MD
their strong finding was that saturated fat was inversely related to particularly stroke so that the more saturated fat you ate the more you were protected from stroke the less the higher you ate the higher rates of stroke
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
their strong finding was that saturated fat was inversely related to particularly stroke so that the more saturated fat you ate the more you were protected from stroke the less the higher you ate the higher rates of stroke
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and otherwise saturated fat did not have a negative effect on heart disease at all
and they found in fact an inverse relationship between saturated fat consumption and stroke rate so people that are eating more saturated fat were actually protected against stroke and people who are eating less saturated fat were at higher risk of having a stroke