The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the key thing here is this isn't just the reference range which isn't you know super evidence based these are we go for the uh you know like Optimal clinical outcomes range or equal range which is a you know a lot more strict than the reference range and that's the the level where you get the maximum risk reduction in you know heart disease all course mortality good cyber biomarkers Etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.