Paul Saladino· MD
i wanted to actually get the degree of modification because i do think if you could count the actual oxidized phospholipids that would be a powerful metric
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
i wanted to actually get the degree of modification because i do think if you could count the actual oxidized phospholipids that would be a powerful metric
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's as if you were to for a given unit of blood count the oxidized phospholipids the ox pl on apob apob containing lipoproteins
if you don't know what that is we get into it in this podcast but it's a much better way of getting a sense of oxidized ldl rather than the traditional ox ldl assays which are inherently flawed
so if you have more ldl you're going to have more ldl particles with a few or a single oxidized phospholipids that is normal human biology the question is what is the percentage or what is the number of oxidized phospholipids on april b that is a test that only boston heart does so really there's only one reasonable test of oxidized ldl or oxidized aob particles out there and it's not run by 99 of the labs