The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my LDL particle number is between 1600 and 2000 Nana mole per liter meaning if you actually counted the number of LDL particles in the sample that they're looking at they're getting in my case say 1600 times 10 to the 14th molecules of LDL that is a huge number right huge we're talking I mean almost an astronomical number
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well people will probably be shocked to learn that even at an LDL of 100 milligrams per deciliter generally speaking assuming an average particle size you have 1 times 10 to the 18th particles of LDL in your body that is 18 zeros that is a very very large number yeah when you have an LDL of 300 milligrams per deciliter you have 3 times 10 to the 18th particles of LDL in your body now granted that's three times the other number but one times 10 to the 18th particles of LDL is still a huge number how could something at one time sin to the 18th not be toxic to our endothelium and then at 3 times 10 to the 18th be toxic suddenly toxic to our in the thelia
if you multiply those out you get something like 3 times 10 to the 18 which is quintillions of LDL particles and if you do the same math for HDL particle numbers you get something like 100 quintillion which is 1 times 10 to the 20 particles