The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for example when I got coveted in November we were able to see in real time what was happening to my lungs and my heart it was pretty bad and it was alarming because I had a pretty mild case of covet I had a fever for 24 hours I felt pretty bad for a couple days but it wasn't a terrible case and even though I didn't feel that bad the damage we saw my lungs and heart were significant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.