Bryan Johnson· Author
My Pulse wave Velocity (PWV) of 5.7, ranks in 10% <30, top 5% of 45+.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
My Pulse wave Velocity (PWV) of 5.7, ranks in 10% <30, top 5% of 45+.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
gold why things pulse wave velocity 80 accurate to sphigma core I think R equals 0.8 not the vascular age the pulse wave velocity which they don't show on the screen there but it's very nice device again pwv measurements which is a marker of an independent risk predictor and a marker of arterial age normally in the acrostic femoral region of the overall arterial organ across the body and my last pwv measurement I think was 5.7 is that right yeah it's age 33 equivalent which is the maximum you can go because it doesn't start aging until that point onwards