Paul Saladino· MD
most of the carnivores I test for igf-1 are around 120 which is significantly lower than people on mixed diets who are not even carnivores
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
most of the carnivores I test for igf-1 are around 120 which is significantly lower than people on mixed diets who are not even carnivores
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
IC igf-1 levels as I talked about in this podcast that are generally about the average or even part of a standard deviation below the average so it's clear that we are not over stimulating our igf-1 on this type of a diet
when I've checked my igf-1 on a carnivore diet which may be surprising for you it's pretty low it's at least one standard deviation below the mean
When I've checked my igf-1 on a carnivore diet which may be surprising for you it's pretty low it's at least one standard deviation below the mean so the z-score just like people will get a DEXA scan for bone density and they'll give you a mean and then they'll give you a z-score which is how many standard deviations you are above or below the mean the z-score that I see in my clients on a carnivore diet and and myself is usually below the mean sometimes it's more than a standard deviation below the mean
what i've seen anecdotally in myself and many other carnivores that we've measured igf-1 levels in they're quite low they're very low i've seen igf-1 fasting levels you know after like a 12-hour fast of like 120 or 140 down to like 70 or 90