Paul Saladino· MD
if I ate them in the morning as opposed to eating them at night I would have a smaller blood glucose response in the morning and a larger blood glucose response at night
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if I ate them in the morning as opposed to eating them at night I would have a smaller blood glucose response in the morning and a larger blood glucose response at night
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and maybe it makes sense to me that in the evening and that's one of the reasons i eat earlier in the day in the evening your body is kind of saying hey it's time to chill out maybe give the pancreas a rest maybe don't do so many carbs in the evening and you can tell that with a continuous glucose monitor something like that
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.