Paul Saladino· MD
the continuous glucose monitor is I just see them like you said they don't really go that high I mean I don't see them go over 100 mm exactly
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the continuous glucose monitor is I just see them like you said they don't really go that high I mean I don't see them go over 100 mm exactly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I guess if they're under stress or they're exercising really hard, you might get a blip, but generally speaking like a CGM trace is a very, very good way to tell if someone is adhering to a ketogenic diet.
But a CGM device is like the ultimate device to look at dietary adherence to a ketogenic diet because it should be...the trace should be completely flat, and if there's big excursions, then that person is not on a ketogenic diet.
A CGM trace is a very, very good way to [inaudible]
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.