Paul Saladino· MD
um we're we're being told that you want an absolutely flat glucose level, which is in my opinion totally false. You don't want that. You don't want that at all. And it's okay for your insulin to go up.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
um we're we're being told that you want an absolutely flat glucose level, which is in my opinion totally false. You don't want that. You don't want that at all. And it's okay for your insulin to go up.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
don't you dare use that to keep a tight ceiling like 110 on your blood sugar that is a prison
this obsession with keeping your blood sugar below 110 as a peak or an average of 85 with a standard deviation of 10 milligrams that's a leader for me this hurts people because it's much too tight control
this obsession with keeping your blood sugar below 110 as a peak or an average of 85 with a standard deviation of 10 milligrams that's a leader for me this hurts people because it's much too tight control
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.