Andrew Huberman· PhD
always including a little bit of fiber really helped it and that makes sense right slow the absorption of the food presumably
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
always including a little bit of fiber really helped it and that makes sense right slow the absorption of the food presumably
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
fiber can in a sense create like a mesh sort of blocking the absorption of some of the glucose that's in the meal so literally kind of actually preventing you from absorbing all of the carbs and we've actually seen that in the levels data set that the more fiber people include with their meals we see essentially a direct relationship with lowering of their their glucose excursions
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.