what we're looking for is you want your blood glucose To Be steady throughout the day you don't want to eat things that make it Spike
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
what we're looking for is you want your blood glucose To Be steady throughout the day you don't want to eat things that make it Spike
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, I think it's important to take a macro view too and look at the big picture. What's your glucose doing in a 24/7, you know, we have two weeks of data at least for everybody. What's it doing in a two-week average? What's your average glucose? What's your standard deviation, which is the swings in glucose? We want to see how these postprandial responses are contributing to a bigger picture.
And I think 160 is a decent threshold to reach for. But what we tell our individuals, our customers at NutriSense, is that this is really about repetition. If you have, you know, three meals a day you're eating and all of them are hitting 150 and that's contributing then to an average glucose that's rising, you're having a slower recovery, a larger area under the curve, that's a much different story than somebody who has one glucose spike during the day to 140 and it comes back down to 100 in an hour.
if a person's average blood glucose is 98 milligrams per deciliter with a standard deviation of 16 milligrams per deciliter it doesn't really matter what kind of spikes they have because they're they're clearly not going to be too many
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.