Andrew Huberman· PhD
But because of the (anti-health) policy of daylight savings time, a lot of people cannot. In which case, bright artificial light is going to be your next best choice.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But because of the (anti-health) policy of daylight savings time, a lot of people cannot. In which case, bright artificial light is going to be your next best choice.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Daylight savings year-round, on the other hand, might limit the ability to get sufficient morning light exposure, especially for those who work indoors during normal work hours.